This essay studies the links between transcendental philosophy and experience through the concept of the “historical sign”. This concept applies to an historical event, which, in itself, allows one to “pass” from historical experience to the supra-rational realm of Progress. As the indicator of Humanity’s moral disposition, the sign corroborates the Idea of progress. The historical sign identified by Kant is “the way the spectator thinks, expressed at the time of the French Revolution. However, Kant concurrently uses the vocabulary of disinterestedness, peculiar to the judgment of taste, as well as the vocabulary of enthusiasm, more appropriate to the sublime. This equivocacy casts a doubt on the status of the sign attributed to this way of thinking and on the manner in which it is possible to pass from the empirical to the transcendental.
digital and print editions published in November-December 2016 by Éditions Ionas; 2nd revised and amended digital edition published by Éditions Ismael.
Introduction
Reconstruction d’une critique kantienne de la prédiction téléologique et du progrès
– a) Pars destruens: la critique de l’annonce politique, de la prophétie ecclésiastique et de la divination.
– b) Pars construens (1): l’hypothèse de l’Histoire universelle et l’impératif morale du Progrès.
– c) Pars construens (2): le signe historique
II. Déduction de la prétention de l’expérience de la Révolution française à constituer un signe historique, moral et universel
– a) L’interprétation arendtienne d’une philosophie politique du jugement de goût.
– b) La critique habermassienne d’un modèle politique issu de la faculté de juger.
– c) La position de Lyotard.
– 1. La critique du sens de la communauté.
– 2. Une politique du sublime.
Conclusion
Bibliographie